Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: http://lib.inmeds.com.ua:8080/jspui/handle/lib/4424
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorHolyachenko, Oleksandr A.-
dc.contributor.authorKravchenko, Anatolii M.-
dc.contributor.authorGolyachenko, Andrii O.-
dc.contributor.authorGurianov, Vitaliy G.-
dc.contributor.authorKarol, Ivan V.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-26T20:19:12Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-26T20:19:12Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://lib.inmeds.com.ua:8080/jspui/handle/lib/4424-
dc.description.abstractThe aim: To compare the results of femoro-popliteal PTA vs open surgery in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and analyze clinical efficacy long-term results. Materials and methods: Between 2018 – 2019, 145 patients with CLTI who underwent femoro-popliteal arterial segment steno-occlusive lesions (SOL) unilateral revascularization. Open surgery were performed for – 48 (33, 1℅), percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for – 73 (50.3%), and were treated with hybrid surgical interventions for – 24 (16.6%). Results: During the analysis, no statistically significant difference was found among the three groups patients indicators. According to the diabetes patients indicator, the differences among the groups are statistically significant (p<0.001), diabetes was present in only 16.7% of open surgical intervention group patients, 45.8% of PTA group patients, 54.8% of the hybrid surgery group patients. In the overall comparison 2-year limb preservation after open surgery 93.8%, after PTA 91.7%, and after hybrid surgery 91.6%; amputations: open surgery – 6.2% PTA- 8.2 %, hybrid surgery -8.3%; exemption from surgical re-intervention: open surgery - 68.7%, PTA- 58.9%, hybrid surgery – 75%. There were no differences in limb preservation and amputation between open surgery, hybrid intervention, and PTA. A difference was found only in reintervention tactic among the open surgery and PTA groups as opposed to the hybrid surgery. Сonclusions: Limb salvage and CLTI patients survival after open surgery and PTA who were not performed major amputation in 2 years term after revascularization were comparable regardless of treatment method.uk_UK
dc.language.isoenuk_UK
dc.publisherWiadomości Lekarskieuk_UK
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVOLUME LXXV, ISSUE 11 PART 1;-
dc.subjectpercutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)uk_UK
dc.subjectsteno-occlusive lesionsuk_UK
dc.subjectduplex ultrasound scanuk_UK
dc.titleFEMOROPOPLITEAL ANGIOPLASTY VS OPEN SURGERY FOR CHRONIC LIMB-THREATENING ISCHEMIAuk_UK
dc.typeArticleuk_UK
Розташовується у зібраннях:Кафедра загальної та невідкладної хірургії

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
1669719472165256.pdf12.83 MBAdobe PDFПереглянути/Відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.