Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: http://lib.inmeds.com.ua:8080/jspui/handle/lib/4034
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorDorofeyev, A.E.-
dc.contributor.authorDyadyk, O.O.-
dc.contributor.authorZvyagintseva, T.D.-
dc.contributor.authorChychula, Yu.V.-
dc.contributor.authorRudenko, N.N.-
dc.contributor.authorStukalo, A.A.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-05T14:10:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-05T14:10:32Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-
dc.identifier.issne2373-6372-
dc.identifier.urihttp://lib.inmeds.com.ua:8080/jspui/handle/lib/4034-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of esophageal mucus barrier correction by complex treatment with sodium hyaluronate and sodium alginate (Hyalera/ Gastropiù Bustine) application in patients with gastroesophagic reflux disease (GERD). We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open, comparative study with parallel monitoring to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy for patients with GERD using the sodium hyaluronate and sodium alginate (Hyalera/Gastropiù Bustine). Under our supervision, there were 72 patients with GERD aged 18 to 65years. Women were 30 (41.7%), men 42 (58.3%). The criterion for inclusion in the study was the presence of GERD symptoms (primarily heartburn) with endoscopic and morphological confirmation. Omeprazole at a dose of 20mg 2 times a day and domperidone at a dose of 10mg 3 times a day were used as basic therapy in both groups. In the first group, an additional sodium hyaluronate and sodium alginate (Hyalera/Gastropiù Bustine) emulsion of 15ml sticks (Alpiflor, Italy) was prescribed. The emulsion was administered 1 stick after a meal 3 times a day. The frequency of heartburn in the first group after treatment was almost three times lower than in the comparison group (p =0.035) and they did not have nightly heartburn. Also, dysphagia was absent in the first group (almost 7% of patients remained in the second), at the same time, the incidence of belching after treatment was identical in both groups (20 and 17%). Endoscopically, in the second group, 4.5 times more often than in the first, esophagitis was detected, and in 1 patient it was erosive. Morphologically, in patients of the first group, significant positive dynamics was noted.uk_UK
dc.language.isoenuk_UK
dc.publisherGastroenterology & Hepatology: Open Access. P. 22-26uk_UK
dc.relation.ispartofseries;№12(1)-
dc.subjectGERDuk_UK
dc.subjectgastroesophagic reflux diseaseuk_UK
dc.subjectesophagoscopyuk_UK
dc.subjectanti-inflammatory drugsuk_UK
dc.subjectclaudinsuk_UK
dc.subjectoccludinsuk_UK
dc.subjectantisecretory therapyuk_UK
dc.subjectECGuk_UK
dc.subjectalcoholismuk_UK
dc.subjectdrug addictionuk_UK
dc.subjectvarying degreesuk_UK
dc.subjectpapillomatosis cellsuk_UK
dc.subjectmanifestationsuk_UK
dc.titleMucus barrier correction as a target in complex treatment of gastroesophageal reflux diseaseuk_UK
dc.typeArticleuk_UK
Розташовується у зібраннях:Кафедра патологічної та топографічної анатомії

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
ГиалераСШАGHOA-12-00451.pdf747.29 kBAdobe PDFПереглянути/Відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.