Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: http://lib.inmeds.com.ua:8080/jspui/handle/lib/2184
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorGarg, Amit-
dc.contributor.authorPathak, Hardik-
dc.contributor.authorChuryukanov, Maxim V-
dc.contributor.authorUppin, Rajendra B-
dc.contributor.authorСлободін, Тетяна Миколаївна-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-29T12:18:02Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-29T12:18:02Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-
dc.identifier.citationGarg A, Pathak H, Churyukanov MV, Uppin RB, Slobodin TM. Low back pain: critical assessment of various scales. Eur Spine J. 2020 Mar;29(3):503-518. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06279-5. Epub 2020 Jan 8. PMID: 31916001.uk_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://lib.inmeds.com.ua:8080/jspui/handle/lib/2184-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To study the various pain assessment tools based on their psychometric properties and ease of use. Methods: Published articles on psychometric properties of pain tools were accessed and data collected for low back pain (LBP)-specific tools, generic tools, neuropathic LBP tools, tools for cognitively impaired patients, and tools for acute LBP. Results: Among the LBP-specific tools, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) have good construct validity and reliability, and responsiveness over short intervals. Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) gauges only disability and sleep. Among the generic tools, McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI), and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) show good responsiveness, but BPI is the only tool validated for LBP. Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) and Short Form-MPQ-2 (SF-MPQ-2) are both reliable tools for neuropathic LBP. For cognitively impaired patients, Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD), Abbey Pain Scale (APS), and Doloplus-2 are all reliable tools, but PAINAD has good construct validity. For acute pain, Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment (CAPA) is reliable and responsive, but presently, unidimensional tools and SF-MPQ-2 are the tools most preferred. Conclusion: Based on psychometric properties and ease of use, the best tools for LBP seem to be RMDQ/ODI (among LBP-specific tools), BPI (among generic tools), SF-MPQ-2/NPS (for neuropathic LBP), PAINAD (for cognitively impaired patients), and unidimensional tools and SF-MPQ-2 (for acute pain). Overall, BPI seems to be a tool that can be relied upon the most. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.uk_UK
dc.language.isoenuk_UK
dc.publisherEur Spine Juk_UK
dc.subjectBPI; Low back pain tools; ODI; Psychometric properties; RMDQ.uk_UK
dc.titleLow back pain: critical assessment of various scalesuk_UK
dc.typeArticleuk_UK
Розташовується у зібраннях:Кафедра неврології - 1

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
Слободин статья Скопус.pdf964.44 kBAdobe PDFПереглянути/Відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.